<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arminianism: The Hot Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foedustheologus.com/the_gospel/arminianism_the_hot_debate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foedustheologus.com/the_gospel/arminianism_the_hot_debate.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sly Fox</title>
		<link>http://foedustheologus.com/the_gospel/arminianism_the_hot_debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Sly Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackandreformed.mulyoo.com/2006/02/28/arminianism_the_hot_debate/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Wow!  More than a little heavyhanded on a subject that is nowhere near as black &amp; white in Scripture as you imply in this blog.  To declare Arminianism as false gospel is more than a little over-the-top.  I admit I take the opposite side of this discussion but you won&#039;t catch me calling Calvinism false doctrine.
If this were as cut &amp; dried as you imply then this wouldn&#039;t be such a hot topic for debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow!  More than a little heavyhanded on a subject that is nowhere near as black &amp; white in Scripture as you imply in this blog.  To declare Arminianism as false gospel is more than a little over-the-top.  I admit I take the opposite side of this discussion but you won&#8217;t catch me calling Calvinism false doctrine.<br />
If this were as cut &amp; dried as you imply then this wouldn&#8217;t be such a hot topic for debate.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
